Thinking Before Acting: Embracing Multiple Perspectives for Better Decisions

In The Father Brown Stories, G. K. Chesterton created a conversation between Father Brown and Flambeau where it was said, “There’s a disadvantage in a stick pointing straight,” answered the other. “What is it? Why, the other end of the stick always points the opposite way. It depends whether you get hold of the stick by the right end. I saw the thing done once and I’ve never believed in it since” (p. 118). I loved this. It offers a valuable lesson and analogy about perception, perspective, and the importance of understanding context. The pointing of the stick highlights how our assumptions or initial perceptions can be misleading if we don’t consider the full picture.

The key takeaway for me was that things are often not what they seem at first glance. Just as grabbing a stick by one end reveals a different direction on the other, approaching problems, people, or situations without fully understanding their context can lead to misunderstandings or errors. Chesterton suggested the importance of perspective—seeing things from multiple angles before forming a conclusion.
Chesterton may have never intended those lines to serve as a leadership lesson encouraging us to:
- Avoid jumping to conclusions based solely on initial impressions.
- Recognize that different perspectives can reveal truths that are not immediately visible.
- Approach challenges with curiosity and an open mind, considering all sides before acting.
But, that thought of a stick pointing both directions sure made me ponder. How about you?
Leading With Humility

I am really loving the Father Brown Stories by G.K. Chesterton. I’m only about a quarter of the way through the book, but my favorite story so far is in Chapter 9, “The Hammer of God.” At one point in the story, Father Brown asserts, “Humility is the mother of giants. One sees great things from the valley; only small things from the peak.” I had seen that quote from Chesterton before, but now in the context of the story it was powerful metaphor.

We have to be very careful of letting our pride take us to high and mighty places where others begin to appear small to us. Chesterton went on to say in that story, “But he saw all men walking about like insects.” We need to be careful to not let ourselves get too comfortable on the peak and looking down on others. Think of how beautiful the view looking up at the mountain with others around us is.
I am reminded of Drybar’s seventh core value: “7. Nothing is sexier than honesty and humility!” I wrote about this in Becoming Humble. Learning from and with others, asking questions, and asking for help are hallmarks of an effective and humble leader.
Conveying More Than Literal Meaning

I have always stressed that language matters. It matters a lot! I love that G.K. Chesterton, through the character of Father Brown in the Father Brown Stories, explored themes of human nature, morality, and the importance of understanding others. Chesterton’s stories emphasize that sometimes the true understanding of a mystery or a person’s motives requires insight into their character and the use of common sense, rather than superficial judgments.

In Chapter 5 – The Invisible Man, Father Brown said, “Have you ever noticed this—that people never answer what you say? They answer what you mean—or what they think you mean.” He then went on to give this example: “Suppose one lady says to another in a country house, ‘Is anybody staying with you?’ the lady doesn’t answer ‘Yes; the butler, the three footmen, the parlourmaid, and so on,’ though the parlourmaid may be in the room, or the butler behind her chair. She says ‘There is nobody staying with us,’ meaning nobody of the sort you mean. But suppose a doctor inquiring into an epidemic asks, ‘Who is staying in the house?’ then the lady will remember the butler, the parlourmaid, and the rest.” This highlighted a common human tendency we have to focus more on interpreting the underlying meaning or intent behind what someone says rather than merely responding to the literal words.
Chesterton went on to tell us in the story that, “All language is used like that; you never get a question answered literally, even when you get it answered truly.” Chesterton was pointing out that people often listen for the implied message, assumptions, or emotions beneath the surface, rather than taking questions at their face value.
This observation encourages us to be more aware of the nuances in communication—recognizing that conversations are frequently about understanding intentions and context, not just the explicit words spoken. It also reminds us to be mindful of how our own words might be interpreted, intentionally or unintentionally conveying more than their literal meaning. Again, language matters!
Embracing Curiosity and Compassion: Timeless Lessons from Father Brown

Scholars have asserted that G. K. Chesterton’s character, Father Brown, has imaginative empathy. This type of empathy, as demonstrated by Father Brown in Chesterton’s stories, refers to the ability to genuinely understand and share the feelings, thoughts, and perspectives of others by using imagination and intuition. Unlike simple sympathy or rational analysis, imaginative empathy involves immersing oneself into another’s experience, often seeing the world from their point of view, even when it’s unfamiliar or complex.

From Father Brown, we learn that:
- Deep understanding fosters trust. When we, as leaders, take the time to empathize genuinely, we create stronger connections and trust with others.
- Insight leads to better decision-making. By placing ourselves in others’ shoes, we can uncover underlying motives or truths that might otherwise be missed.
- Creativity and problem-solving thrive when we embrace curiosity. Imaginative empathy encourages flexible thinking, allowing one to approach challenges from multiple perspectives.
- Emulating Father Brown’s curiosity helps us cultivate a more compassionate and open-minded attitude towards others.
By adopting imaginative empathy we enhance our ability to connect, innovate, and lead with insight and kindness—qualities essential for personal growth and effective leadership.
Leading With Questions Like Father Brown

Having just finished G. K. Chesterton’s Heretics, I began reading his Father Brown Stories. I’m only two stories in and I am already completely enthralled. Chesterton described Father Brown this way: “Father Brown had the kind of head that cannot help asking questions.”From this description we can draw valuable lessons about curiosity in leadership.

We can be a curious leader, like Father Brown. We just need to demonstrate a genuine interest in understanding different perspectives, uncovering underlying issues, and exploring new ideas. This inquisitiveness can foster a culture of continuous learning, encourage openness, and builds trust within our organizations. By asking thoughtful questions and really listening to understand the answers we receive, we invite collaboration, empower others to share their insights, and identify opportunities for growth and improvement.
Let’s face it, curiosity fuels innovation and resilience. It helps leaders stay adaptable, make informed decisions, and connect more deeply with their team members. Emulating Father Brown’s inquisitiveness can lead to a more engaged, creative, and high-performing environment in our organizations.
Living With Fiery Possibilities

I am so loving that I picked G. K. Chesterton as my next Marion E. Wade Center author to read and study. I’ve already read Orthodoxy and am about to finish Heretics. Both of these books are outstanding and I have come to appreciate Chesterton’s unique style of writing. I must admit it is not easy ready for me. I have had to go back over passages multiple times to ponder what he was wanting the reader to learn from his content. One such passage was in Chapter XIV of Heretics when he was comparing life to a novel.

Chesterton told us, “People wonder why the novel is the most popular form of literature; people wonder why it is read more than books of science or books of metaphysics. The reason is very simple; it is merely that the novel is more true than they are” (p. 82). As a person who has come to learn a great deal from works of fiction, I believe Chesterton was arguing that novels tend to reflect human nature and real life more accurately than specialized scientific or philosophical texts.
By saying the novel is “more true,” Chesterton meant that it captures the complexities, contradictions, and subtleties of everyday human experience in a way that abstract theories or factual accounts might not fully do. Essentially, novels resonate with us because they mirror the genuine messiness and richness of life, making them highly relatable and understandable to our own messy and unpredictable lives.
Chesterton went on to say, “But in order that life should be a story or romance to us, it is necessary that a great part of it, at any rate, should be settled for us without our permission. If we wish life to be a system, this may be a nuisance; but if we wish it to be a drama, it is an essential.” He was reminding us that for life to feel meaningful and exciting, like a novel, some aspects of our lives need to be beyond our control. While having a predictable, orderly system might offer comfort, it can also make life feel dull or monotonous. We need to embrace the unpredictability and surprises, that are outside our influence. These unpredictable moments, while sometimes unwanted or inconvenient, turn our lives into a vibrant story.
While it is important and necessary to have goals and plans we need to remember some things are outside our control and impact our stationary life goals. Many look at their life and career as moving up a ladder. I have always said it really is more of a lattice. Imagine life without some surprises. While we will never know exactly what that would be like, I have to believe it would tend to feel tame and unfulfilling. Life would certainly lack the fiery possibilities that arise from facing the unknown or overcoming obstacles.
Leading With A Growing Reed

When leaders have specific goals to aim for, those serve as a guiding “fixed point,” helping everyone stay accountable and aligned. One of the things we discuss a lot in education is making sure we don’t keep moving those targets so leaders truly have fixed points. I loved the metaphor G. K. Chesterton used in Heretics. He said, “A man might measure heaven and earth with a reed, but not with a growing reed.” Think about how hard it would be to measure against a reed that is growing and changing. Impossible to get a true reading, right?

The paradox, however, in the image of a growing reed that is constantly changing and flexible is that it highlights the importance of adaptability in the face of shifting circumstances. While we must have clear targets that are constant a target to work against and valuable for accountability, there’s also a need to remain open-minded and ready to adjust when new information, opportunities, or challenges arise.
We can use this paradox to our advantage to remember to balance having clear objectives (to ensure accountability) with the agility and flexibility to adapt those targets as situations evolve. As leaders we need to remember we all work in dynamic environments.
Shaping Our Path Forward: Eden’s Symbolism for Embracing Change Without Losing Sight of Our Origins

I finished Orthodoxy by G. K. Chesterton last week and I’m still working through my notes for further pondering. I was intrigued by Chesterton’s assertion that his ideal as a Christian was fixed. He said, “My ideal at least is fixed; for it was fixed before the foundations of the world. My vision of perfection assuredly cannot be altered; for it is called Eden” (p. 125). This reminded me that In Christian theology, Eden represents the original paradise created by God—a perfect, divine environment where Adam and Eve lived in harmony with God, nature, and each other before the Fall. It symbolizes innocence, purity, and innocent obedience, as well as God’s initial intention for humanity to live in a state of perfect harmony and communion with Him. Eden also serves as a reminder of the loss of this innocence due to sin, prompting the Christian hope for redemption and the eventual restoration of that perfect relationship with God in Heaven.

Chesterton was asserting that his ideal or vision of perfection was eternal and unchanging, rooted in a divine or perfect state—specifically Eden. By stating that his ideal was fixed before the foundations of the world, he emphasized its timeless and unalterable nature. Eden, as a symbol of perfect harmony and innocence, represents this ultimate, unchangeable ideal that exists beyond human fluctuations or imperfections. Essentially, Chesterton was highlighting the permanence of true perfection and the enduring desire for that ideal, which remains constant regardless of worldly changes.
G.K. Chesterton’s quote, “You may alter the place to which you are going; but you cannot alter the place from which you have come” (p. 125), suggested that while our circumstances or destinations in life may change, our origins—our background, past experiences, and foundational beliefs—remain integral and influence who we are. It emphasizes that we can’t erase or ignore our roots, and that our journey forward is always rooted in where we’ve come from. This idea encourages humility and self-awareness, reminding us to acknowledge our history as we navigate new paths.
Embracing Humility: Unlocking Life’s Unexpected Gifts and Adventures

I am absolutely loving my study of G. K. Chesterton. In Heretics, that I am reading right now, he emphasized the profound impact that humility can have on individuals and their actions. Chesterton said, “It is the humble man who does the big things. It is the humble man who does the bold things. It is the humble man who has the sensational sights vouchsafed to him” (p. 28). He was highlighting that true greatness and significant achievements often come from those who are quietly humble, rather than boastful or seeking recognition. Chesterton wanted us to understand that humility allows us to focus on meaningful pursuits without the distractions of ego, enabling us to experience and accomplish remarkable things. He encouraged us to see value in modesty, as it can be a powerful force for genuine influence and extraordinary experiences.

At the end of the same paragraph where the quote above was taken from in Heretics, Chesterton asserts that “Adventures are to those to whom they are most unexpected — that is, most romantic. Adventures are to the shy: in this sense adventures are to the unadventurous” (p. 28). He was pointing out that true adventure often comes unexpectedly and can be especially meaningful for those who might not seek it out aggressively—nameless, shy, or unadventurous individuals. This idea ties closely to humility because it emphasizes openness and receptivity rather than arrogance or overconfidence.
This really hit home for me as a person who has never really had a life plan. Other’s I grew up with or am acquainted with now have elaborate plans with goals and benchmarks. I have never done that. I guess this speaks to the faith that Chesterton also speaks of that I believe God has a plan and I let that plan play out. That does not mean I do not have to still work hard and do my part, but I do get to let the adventure play out. I’ve never seen others’ perfect plans play out perfectly. So why not be a long-life learning, keep growing personally and professionally, and be ready for opportunity when it knocks?
When we approach life with humility, we’re more likely to recognize and embrace the surprises and opportunities that come our way, rather than forcing or controlling them. The humble person is open-minded and receptive, qualities that allow adventures—those unexpected, romantic moments—to find them naturally. In this sense, humility creates a mindset where life’s most meaningful experiences are understood as gifts rather than achievements, encouraging us to remain modest and receptive to the world’s surprises.
Embracing Constraints: How Limits Ignite Creativity and Deepen Artistic Expression

It is so exciting to be reading G. K. Chesterton, specifically Orthodoxy, right now. I love his use of examples, analogies, and metaphors. When discussing anarchism he argued that we are told to be creative artists without regard to any limits or laws. He refuted this saying, “But it is impossible to be an artist and not care for laws and limits. Art is limitation; the essence of every picture is the frame” (p. 44). Artists often thrive within certain boundaries—whether it’s the conventions of their chosen medium, societal expectations, or personal principles. These limits can serve as frameworks that inspire creativity, challenge artists to innovate within constraints, or help them communicate more effectively.

Chesterton’s quote highlights a profound insight into the nature of art: that limitation is not merely an obstacle but a fundamental component of creation. When he said, “the essence of every picture is the frame,” he emphasized that boundaries—like the frame surrounding a painting—shape and define the artwork, giving it structure and focus.
To illustrate what he meant, Chesterton gave us this example:
“If you draw a giraffe, you must draw him with a long neck. If, in your bold creative way, you hold yourself free to draw a giraffe with a short neck, you will really find that you are not free to draw a giraffe” (p. 44).
In this context, laws and limits serve as frameworks within which creativity can flourish. They help artists make deliberate choices about composition, form, and content, guiding their expression while still allowing room for innovation and transcendence. Without boundaries, art could become aimless or overwhelming, lacking coherence or impact.
Chesterton also left room for the idea that true artistic freedom often involves pushing against or transcending these limits. While the frame confines the artwork visually, the artist’s intention might involve breaking traditional boundaries, exploring new techniques, or challenging societal norms—all within or beyond existing limits. This tension between respecting constraints and daring to go beyond them fuels originality and emotional depth.
What Chesterton was suggesting is that limits are not inherently restrictive but are instead essential to all creative processes. They provide the structure necessary for meaningful expression, while the artist’s skill and imagination determine how to work within or surpass those boundaries to produce truly revolutionary art. This same idea of structure is true for us as leaders.
Whether an artist painting a picture or and artistic leader of an organization we need to push against restrictions to explore new ideas, challenge norms, and express our individuality. So, while laws and limits can guide and shape artistic expression, they don’t have to be strictly binding; sometimes, transcendence of boundaries leads to the most revolutionary art. Ultimately, whether we, as artists, should live by restrictions and limits depends on our intentions, style, and the message we wish to convey.
leave a comment