Framing The Causes
The term “causality” has always given me pause. First, I believe the term is overused in research. Causality assumes that the value of an interdependent variable is the reason for the value of a dependent variable. Social science and education research is very interested in making causal claims. This causal inference remains especially difficult to prove. My problem with claims of causality are the multiple potential explanations that always exist. This does not mean I don’t think causality is important to science. The best research uses methods for getting to causality. When statistically significant causality is proven it is very valuable. As I stated earlier, however, I just believe we are, at times, too quick to claim causality.
It is also interesting to me that causality is a topic debated in theology. In fact, in The Christian In The World, C.S. Lewis credits Sir Arthur Eddington with saying, “Each event comes from another event.” From the reading I believe Lewis struggled with this as an absolute philosophy and I always have too. Everything in life is too complex for that. Causality at face value means that every event or occurrence is caused by a preceding event or set of events. In other words, there a chain of cause and effect in the world, where one event leads to another, and so on. I believe we need to recognize the interconnectedness and continuity of events in our lives and in the world around us. While there may be provable causalities in some cases, we must remember there may be multiple contributing factors.
Byron's Babbles 
leave a comment